• Why Trump won't like what's in the Senate Intelligence Committee report

    House Republicans' version of events on why Russia meddled in the 2016 election — and how the FBI handled its ensuing investigation — has been noticeably pro-Trump.

    That was underscored Wednesday when members of the president's own party in the Senate contradicted one of House Republicans' key political findings -- a favorite of President Trump to trumpet.

    House Republicans investigating Russia meddling ended their investigation last month, saying that Russia's government tried to influence the 2016 election, but not to help Trump win the presidency. The House GOP's conclusion directly contradicted the entire U.S. intelligence community's, but it was a big win for Trump. The president has been hesitant to acknowledge that Russia meddled on his part, ostensibly out of fear that doing so would undermine his win.

    But now the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee, which released its own assessment Wednesday is contradicting the House report, saying Russia did try to help Trump win.

    “Our staff concluded that the [intelligence community’s] conclusions were accurate and on point,” the panel’s vice chairman, Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), said Wednesday in a joint statement with Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.)

    That's a problem for Trump.

    When House Republicans released their version of events in May, Trump championed it as yet more proof he's innocent of all things related to Russia: of being favored by them during the election, of colluding with them to help him win and of obstructing the ensuing investigation into the first two.

    Whether there was collusion or obstruction of justice still undecided, both by the Senate Intelligence Committee and, more notably for Trump, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who has prosecutorial powers.

    But the Senate Intelligence Committee, whose investigation has long been considered the more bipartisan the congressional ones, just significantly watered down Trump's first argument that Russia didn't help him in two big ways:

    1. Even Republican lawmakers who have looked at this seriously say Russia helped Trump

    “I’m not sure that the House was required to substantiate every conclusion with facts,” Burr told reporters last week, by way of explaining why the House report thinks Russia didn't help Trump. That's pretty pointed.

    Legal experts slammed House Republicans' findings too.

    “[Their] assessment doesn’t pass the most basic smell test and is completely unmoored from reality,” Jens David Ohlin, a vice dean at Cornell Law School, told The Fix in April.

    An effort to  undermine the broader intelligence community goes hand-in-hand with Trump and his allies' assessment that Russia was indifferent about who became president.

    Trump and his House Republican allies have for months now tried raise suspicion that the FBI is inept, biased and even corrupt. Implicit in that message is that the FBI, which is lending its resources to the special counsel investigation, is not capable of conducting an accurate or fair investigation into the president.

    House Republicans declassified a memo alleging that the FBI relied on faulty information when it got its warrant to spy on a Trump campaign official during the campaign. But the FBI, led by someone Trump picked, issued a rare public rebuke of that memo, saying it was cherry-picked.

    JUST IN: FBI issues first public statement on the memo release, saying in part “we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

    Trump wanted to release that memo to use it to fire officials in charge of the independent Russia investigation led by Mueller. A few months later, we learned that Trump's GOP allies in the House had drafted highly political articles of impeachment against Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller.

    It gets a lot more difficult for Trump to justify firing Rosenstein or undermining the investigation and the intelligence agents behind it if his own party doesn't agree with him.

    Next on www.washingtonpost.com

    System evaluation: This is  truth  with an error of 50%

    User rating: This is  truth  with an error of 50%

    You can give your personal estimation of the news to underline their conformity to real facts. By voting, you teach the system to distinguish truth and false. Your input will help people get independent view on things happening.